Court Cases Court Cases
AL  AK  AZ  AR  CA  CO  CT  DE  FL  GA  HI  ID  IL  IN  IA  KS  KY  LA  ME  MD  MA  MI  MN  MS  MO  MT  NE  NV 
NH  NJ  NM  NY  NC  ND  OH  OK  OR  PA  RI  SC  SD  TN  TX  UT  VT  VA  WA  WV  WI  WY  EO  NR  PR  DC  US 
 
View Summary
 
PAUL M. LUEDTKE Appellant
vs.
NABORS ALASKA DRILLING INC. Appellee.


Click Here to Read the Full Case Summary
 
Issues:
Drug test, good faith, appeals, termination, suspension.
 
Case Summary:
Paul M. Luedtke's original case before the Supreme Court of Alaska (Luedtke v. Nabors Alaska Drilling, Inc.) is remanded to lower court to determine if his suspension prior to his eventual termination for testing positive in an urinalysis violated the covenant of good faith and fair dealing. On remand, the lower court determines that Nabors did not violate the covenant of good faith. Luedtke appeals the lower court's ruling.
 
Decision of lower jurisdiction:
Upon remand, the Superior Court of Alaska, 3
 
Outcome:
The Supreme Court of Alaska reverses and remands the case for further proceedings.