View Summary
Issues:
Wrongful discharge, public policy.
Case Summary:
Edward Holub brings suit against his former employer and other parties, alleging wrongful discharge and a breech of public policy. Holub contends his employment was terminated because he told federal regulators about concerns he had about the company's compliance with established regulations. The defendants repsond with motions to strike Holub''s primary complaints.
Decision of lower jurisdiction:
This is the first judicial review of this case.
Outcome:
A split decision: The Superior Court of Connecticut at Bridgeport grants the defendant's motion to strike the complaint concerning wrongful discharge, but denies the motion to strike the complaint concerning a breech of public policy.