Court Cases Court Cases
AL  AK  AZ  AR  CA  CO  CT  DE  FL  GA  HI  ID  IL  IN  IA  KS  KY  LA  ME  MD  MA  MI  MN  MS  MO  MT  NE  NV 
NH  NJ  NM  NY  NC  ND  OH  OK  OR  PA  RI  SC  SD  TN  TX  UT  VT  VA  WA  WV  WI  WY  EO  NR  PR  DC  US 
 
View Summary
 
GUY KINOSHITA and RONALD NAKASHIMA Plaintiffs-Appellants
vs.
CANADIAN PACIFIC AIRLINES LIMITED et al. Defendants-Appellees


Click Here to Read the Full Case Summary
 
Issues:
Drugs, evidence, misconduct, safety, policy and procedure, off-duty conduct, disparate treatment, breach of contract.
 
Case Summary:
Guy Kinoshita and Ronald Nakashima, former employees of Canadian Pacific Airlines, appeal a lower court's ruling their suit against the company. Airline officials terminated Kinoshita and Nakashima after local authorities arrested them on cocaine charges. An internal review of the case concluded the two workers violated airline drug policy. Kinoshita and Nakashima subsequently filed suit, claiming wrongful discharge and breach of contract. Kinoshita and Nakashima claimed the airline's employee handbook stated the document constituted an enforceable employment contract. The airline argued the handbook lacked the fundamental elements necessary for a binding contract.
 
Decision of lower jurisdiction:
A U.S. District Court ruled for the company. The court ruled the airline's action did not constitute a breach of contract. The court ruled the two workers were terminated based on their drug arrests. Kinoshita and Nakashima now appeal.
 
Outcome:
A split decision. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the lower court's decision regarding the wrongful discharge complaint. However, the court remanded the case for a new trial on the breach of contract issue.