Court Cases Court Cases
AL  AK  AZ  AR  CA  CO  CT  DE  FL  GA  HI  ID  IL  IN  IA  KS  KY  LA  ME  MD  MA  MI  MN  MS  MO  MT  NE  NV 
NH  NJ  NM  NY  NC  ND  OH  OK  OR  PA  RI  SC  SD  TN  TX  UT  VT  VA  WA  WV  WI  WY  EO  NR  PR  DC  US 
 
View Summary
 
DAVID B. ELLIOTT JR.
vs.
LABORATORY SPECIALISTS INC.


Click Here to Read the Full Case Summary
 
Issues:
Post accident testing, service providers' liability, policy and procedure, marijuana, private right of action, chain of custody.
 
Case Summary:
Officials at Laboratory Specialists, Inc., appeal a lower court's ruling in a suit filed against the laboratory. David Elliott filed suit against Laboratory Specialists after laboratory officials reported to Ellott's employer that he had tested positive for marijuana. Elliott was terminated for violating his employer's drug policy. In fact, the laboratory reported incorrect information. Elliott filed suit against the laboratory. The laboratory argued it had no contract with Elliott and therefore, could not be held responsible for reporting incorrect information to his employer.
 
Decision of lower jurisdiction:
A trial court jury ruled in favor of Elliott and awarded him $25,000. Officials at Laboratory Specialists now appeal.
 
Outcome:
Elliott wins. The Louisiana Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit, affirmed the ruling of the lower jurisdiction. The court ruled that the laboratory was obligated to analyze and report Elliott's test results in a responsible and professional manner.