Court Cases Court Cases
AL  AK  AZ  AR  CA  CO  CT  DE  FL  GA  HI  ID  IL  IN  IA  KS  KY  LA  ME  MD  MA  MI  MN  MS  MO  MT  NE  NV 
NH  NJ  NM  NY  NC  ND  OH  OK  OR  PA  RI  SC  SD  TN  TX  UT  VT  VA  WA  WV  WI  WY  EO  NR  PR  DC  US 
 
View Summary
 
CITY OF ANNAPOLIS et al.
vs.
UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS, LOCAL 400 et al.


Click Here to Read the Full Case Summary
 
Issues:
Public employee, policy and procedures, collective bargaining, union issues, safety, arbitration, random testing, drugs, reasonable suspicion, search.
 
Case Summary:
Officials with the City of Annapolis appeal a court ruling that prohibits the city from implementing a new drug testing policy for its police and firefighters. All applicants for police and fire positions were required to submit to a pre-employment drug test. The city proposed revising its policy to include random testing of all employees. The city and unions representing uniformed police officers and firefighters could not agree on the details of the new plan. The matter was submitted to a state board for mediation. The mediation officer declared the city could expand its drug testing program without the consent of the unions. The unions applied for judicial review.
 
Decision of lower jurisdiction:
A circuit court judge enjoined the city from expanding its plan. The court ruled the city failed to prove either a department-wide or individualized problem with substance abuse.
 
Outcome:
The City of Annapolis wins. The Maryland court of appeals reversed the decision of the lower jurisdiction. Although the city's plan lacked provisions for reasonable suspicion, the court ruled it did not violate rights protected by the constitution.